17
Hot take: The basalt columns at Devil's Postpile aren't as perfect as the guidebooks say
I was at Devil's Postpile National Monument last month, and everyone talks about the columns like they're this flawless example of columnar jointing. But when you get up close, a lot of them are really broken up and weathered. The main cliff face looks great from a distance, but walk around the base and you'll see piles of talus and fractured pieces everywhere. It made me think we over-hype these famous sites and ignore how dynamic erosion really is. The park sign says the columns are about 100,000 years old, and it shows. They're not a clean, textbook diagram; they're a work in progress. I left feeling like the messy, broken parts tell a more honest story than the perfect postcard shot. Has anyone else had that feeling at a famous geologic site, where the reality was more complex than the hype?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
butler.mark3d ago
Honestly, I used to get annoyed by that kind of thing, wanting the perfect picture. But you're totally right. I was at Giant's Causeway once and had the same thought. All the photos show these neat hexagons, but half of them are crumbling or covered in seaweed. Seeing the broken parts and the loose stones around the edges makes it feel more real, like you're seeing the actual process. It's way more interesting than some frozen museum piece.
7
paulperry2d ago
Oh man, you're so right. I felt the exact same way at the Grand Canyon. You see these epic photos of the clean, layered walls, but when you're there, you're staring at a ton of rockfall and slopes of loose rubble (it's basically all falling apart, slowly). That messy stuff is the whole story. It's like what @butler.mark said about Giant's Causeway, the real deal is always more interesting than the perfect postcard. The broken bits prove it's alive and changing.
7